Also, PC2 runs my gpu really hot, which may be a concern to you. Now the map and pieces are realistic, but with the same boardgame scale? It reminded me a lot of going from Civ 4 to 5. PC1 made me think I was looking at pieces on a board. PC2 looks great, but it hits a sort of uncanny valley for me. Graphically I have to say I prefer PC1's sprites, but your mileage will vary. It's not really a fair comparison at this point, but it's definitely something to keep in mind. PC2's campaign is minimum of ~20 scenarios with ~60 total, whereas the PC1 grand campaign is a minimum of ~50 with well over 200 total scenarios across all DLC. Core slots, lingering suppression, encirclement (even half-baked), transport auto-disembark, anti-tank support, ranged AA support, airbasing, dozens of abilities vs PC1s small handful.ДЇrom a a campaign perspective, 's not even close. Inset image from Piercing Fortress Europa by Frank Hunter of Adanac Command StudiesДЇooter image from Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa by Victor Reijkersz of VRDesignsД«ackground: PC1 is one of my favorite games with over 700 hours, and I beta tested PC2 for 60 hours.ДЇrom a rules and gameplay standpoint, PC2 is a huge improvement. Header image from World War II Europe by Ron Dockal of Schwerpunkt Games Related Subreddits: /r/wargames /r/hexandcounter /r/StrategyGames /r/digitaltabletop /r/paradoxplaza /r/totalwar /r/CMANO /r/WarBlog /r/wargame/ /r/MilitaryHistory/ The miniatures are virtual, rulesets/opponents are often handled by the AI! Touching history with digital Hex and chits. A computer based wargaming community for the appreciation of historical wargames.

Panzer 1 vs panzer 2